Skip to content

AWS Security Assessment

196 questions on one AWS estate; a read-only collector proposes, an assessor accepts or overrides.

196 controls · 12 pillars · 40 categories · evidence can be collected automatically

Talk to an assessor See what it asks

Read this as:

An estate accumulates accounts, administrative roles, public endpoints and forgotten data stores faster than any annual review covers, and the breach that follows is usually a setting somebody could have seen. This assessment produces an independent scored position on that estate and a remediation list the board can track to closure. It is our own assessment and not an official Amazon review, audit or certification.

What it asks

196 controls across 12 pillars and 40 categories. Every one is scored, and a control nobody can answer is recorded as unanswered rather than counted as a pass.

Where the answers come from

A read-only script collects configuration from the estate using credentials you issue and revoke afterwards. Each signal becomes a suggested answer with its raw value attached, which an assessor accepts or overrides on the record.

It reads configuration, not traffic, so it cannot tell you whether an open path was ever used - and anything it could not read is marked not evidenced rather than scored.

What you receive

  • A scored report across 196 controls, with a score per pillar and per category.
  • A findings list separating collector-evidenced items from assessor judgement, with the reason recorded wherever the two disagreed.
  • A not-evidenced register: every control the collector could not read and why, so the next run can close the gap.
  • A remediation order built on reachability and blast radius rather than on severity labels alone.

What it does not cover

  • Not an official Amazon review, audit or certification, and not affiliated with or endorsed by Amazon Web Services.
  • Configuration only: no penetration testing, no exploitation and no application code review.
  • Accounts, regions and services outside the agreed scope are not collected from, and are reported as out of scope rather than as passing.

Who this is for

Defence and critical infrastructure

Account separation, egress control and private connectivity decide whether a sensitive workload is actually contained, and the governance, network and data pillars score all three against collected configuration.

Financial services

Operational resilience work wants the cloud estate evidenced rather than attested, which is what the 15 audit logging questions and the 14 on backup and recovery produce.

Healthcare and education

Patient data in object storage and managed databases is the recurring exposure, and the data protection pillar's 19 questions begin with what is reachable from the internet.

What it costs

A fixed fee for the engagement, not an annual licence. The band follows the size of the bank: this one is broad at 196 controls.

Under 250 employees

£4,500

Per engagement, excluding VAT.

250 employees or more

£12,000

Per engagement, excluding VAT.

Hold three or more and the Combined Security View is produced at no extra charge: it is derived from the banks you already hold rather than assessed again. See the full assessment rate card, or build a quote with this assessment in it.

Not sure this is the right one?

There are 16 of them, and the honest answer is that most organisations need two or three rather than all of them. Tell us what you run and what you are being asked to prove.

Compare all 16 Talk to an assessor